Template talk:Industrial Revolution

‹ The template below (WikiProject History) is being considered for merging. See templates for discussion to help reach a consensus. ›

History

This template is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles

Sternuous Objections to this box[edit]

Sorry guys & gals. I seriously object to this box on the following grounds:

Far too big
Far too arbitrary and partial selection of content
Many links are to articles which do not acknowledge the Industrial Revolution (e.g. most on the top line)
Does nothing which a well designed categorisation system would not do just as well

I have no problem with it sitting at the foot of, say, *one* single article about the British Industrial Revolution. But I'll fight tooth & nail to prevent this being stamped on articles bearing on the Industrial Revolution. --Tagishsimon

(Sorry I haven't replied to the note on my page yet, but it's probably best here anyway.) In general, I have a lot of sympathy with this argument, which is why I didn't blast it all over the place as soon as I'd created it. (It is only used on Industrial Revolution itself, so far.) I'll address the points one by one.

Far too big

I have played around with a number of configurations to reduce the footprint: there may be some way left to go.

Far too arbitrary and partial selection of content

This is my pet project, and I think it is going to take a long time. Over time the coverage will grow, which will - of course - make the first problem worse.

Many links are to articles which do not acknowledge the Industrial Revolution (e.g. most on the top line)

Yes. This is something that will be dealt with over time. When I started doing research on the Industrial Revolution within Wikipedia, I found that there was sparse detail. Rather than just create some monolithic central article, I am gathering resources and slowly upgrading articles as I come across them.

Does nothing which a well designed categorisation system would not do just as well

Aye, there's the rub. I hate seeing categories with only one or two entries, which is why I didn't embark on a category structure without amassing all the detail that might need to be illustrated. That may come with time. With this template, the majority of infomation is in a more structured and compact system than the category.

In summary, I won't be putting this anywhere else yet, until its obvious shortcomings have been dealt with. [[User:Noisy|Noisy | Talk]] 10:52, 15 Sep 2004 (UTC)

NavBox style[edit]

User:Noisy can you please justify your revert to the original style? Templationist 17:54, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Very old red link to Dressing frame.[edit]

This template has contained a red link to Dressing frame for over five years now. If the article is unlikely to be made, the link should be removed from the template. Cheers! bd2412 T 22:12, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Link to deleted portal removed[edit]

The Industrial Revolution portal was recently deleted. I've removed the red link from the template. BlackcurrantTea (talk) 13:22, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]